Monday, May 26, 2008

why DOCTORS are so DARN CAGEY!



and no ...
- being cagey does NOT mean you're inside a cage alot ...

So I was chosen for being the scribe for today. Let me tell you guys something. REVENGE GETS YOU NOWHERE. That's why I'm always going to steal Paul's seat from now on. Thanks for choosing me as scribe Paul.



[ SECTION A ]
- SLIDE 2, 3
- Identifying events / dice diagram


[ SECTION B ]
- SLIDE 5, 4
- Probabilities involving "AND" and "OR"
- Testing for independence


[ SECTION C ]
- SLIDE 6, 7, 8, 9
- A test for cancer


[ SECTION D ]
- SLIDE 10
- A test for industrial disease


[ SECTION A ]
- identifying events / dice diagram



SLIDE 2 - IDENTIFYING EVENTS

- and so we started the class finishing off what we had last done in class on Friday.
DRAG N' DROP BABY!
- a list of events which the class had to determine whether it was dependent or independent. Mutually exclusive or not mutually exclusive. I'll take two examples.

b) one card - a red card or a king - is randomly drawn from a deck of cards.
- because it is only ONE event we know that it must be independent
- a red card can also be a king. Therefore it is not mutually exclusive

c) A class president and a class treasurer are randomly selected from a group of 16 students.
- because we can only have ONE president and ONE class treasurer, the event must be dependent. One student cannot be the president and class treasurer. Well in this case it can't. Therefore it is mutually exclusive

SLIDE 3 - THE DICE DIAGRAM

FORGIVE ME IF I AM DOING AN ILLEGAL ACT ON THE INTERNET.

I had actually found this diagram on another blog of Mr. K's class.

This was done to answer the question:
e) Rolling two dice and getting an even sum or a double
- It is independent because the first roll does not affect the chances of the probability for the next roll.
- As you can see on the diagram, you are able to roll a double AND get an even sum. There fore it is not mutually exclusive.


[ SECTION B ]
- Probabilities involving "AND" or "OR"
- Testing for independence



SLIDE 5 - PROBABILITIES INVOLVING "AND" OR "OR"
AKA "THE ADDITION RULE"


here is the slide ...


SLIDE 4 - TESTING FOR INDEPENDENCE



We compared the result of the probability of getting the flu shot and getting the flu. (0.10)
To the result of the probability of the seniors getting the flu (0.15)

There fore the event is dependent if you get the flu shot or not.


[ SECTION C ]
- A test for cancer



SLIDE 6, 7, 8, 9 - A TEST FOR CANCER


- The given question, information and possibilities.


0.5% of 1,000,000 = 1,000,000 x 0.005 = 5000
To find who does not have cancer you would subtract 5000 from 1,000,000
-
98% of the time, the test will be positive.
The amount of people who have cancer and will test positive would be ..
5000 x .98 = 4900
The amount of people who have cancer and will test negative would be ..
5000 x .02 = 100
982% of the time, the test will be negative.
The amount of people who don't have cancer and will test positive would be ..
995,000 x .02 = 19,900
The amount of people who don't have cancer and will test negative would be ..
995,000 x .98 = 975100
-
Adding it up the amount of people who tested positive for cancer
4,900 + 19,900 = 24,800
When only 4,900 actually do have cancer.

The probability that a person who actually does have cancer and tests positive is the amount of people who do have cancer divided by the total amount.

4,900 / 24,800 = 19.75%

Here are the tree diagrams to see how this all works out.




[ SECTION D ]
- A test for industrial disease



SLIDE 610 - A TEST FOR INDUSTRIAL DISEASE



The probability of a person who tested positive and actually does have the industrial disease is much similar to what was done in SECTION C.

The probability of people with industrial disease and tested positive.
DIVIDED BY:
The probability of people with industrial disease and tested positive,
ADDED WITH:
The probability of people without industrial disease and tested positive.


^ does that make sense?!

In other words, and in this case ..

0.0099 / 0.0099 + 0.0099 = 0.5%



NO WONDER DOCTORS ARE SO DAMN CAGEY! ...
... BECAUSE THEY'RE ALWAYS INSIDE CAGES! WOW!
because there is still a great chance that even if you do NOT have cancer, the result may still test POSITIVE

SO YOU MIGHT HAVE CANCER, MUAHAHAHAHA
- not intentionally trying to scare any of you, or myself.
- not intentionally trying to offend anyone who is reading this.
- It's just a joke! Humor in OUR math class is NO laugh matter.

That's it, That's all ladies and 'gents! Have yourself a great day. Go out there and commit random acts of kindness! Cheers!


The next scribe will be ...benofschool

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yo, great scribe post.